| |
This movie sucks, and I’m going to tell you why.
To begin with, there is nothing going on within the story beyond
the story itself. There is no hint of it being a true story per
se, but it is structured just like a true story. It tells us of
Vera Drake (Imelda Staunton), a kind, older woman in the British
50’s. She’s goes about doing good and has a warm family.
All is well with her life until it is discovered that she has
been secretly helping women have abortions. She’s charged
and sent to the slammer. That’s it. That’s all there
is.
The reason it’s supposed to be interesting is because this
is someone who is, otherwise a wonderful person. She’s doesn’t
even charge for her services, but merely does it to help out.
It’s an interesting idea. It’s an idea you could do
something with. Vera Drake, however, does nothing with
it.
We neither know nor understand what is really going on with Vera.
Obviously she means well, but her incessant crying after she is
discovered brings some questions. Namely, why is she crying? It
seems to me, that her primary concern really is for her family.
She’s feels bad that she won’t be there for her family
while she’s doing her time. Her elderly mother depends on
her, and, to a lesser extent, so does her entire family. Secondly,
she also feels shamed. Everyone she knows will now know that she
was a criminal. This certainly brings shame on her and, more importantly,
her good innocent family. Third, she’s may be crying because
it sucks that she’s going to have to go to jail. Fine.
But amongst all these tears I never got the sense that any of
them were tears of remorse for what she’s done. This is
largely because she never felt like what she was doing was truly
wrong. Now, aside from the fact of whether what she was doing
was really wrong or not, this makes the character uninteresting.
She never changes. We see someone do something wrong, get caught,
and go to jail. Not interesting. Not interesting at all.
Sure, she’s an interesting character in herself. She’s
a strong, vibrant person who, living in a lower class world, as
had a hard life and must work hard to keep living. And yet, she
puts herself at risk to do something she feels is noble. That’s
fine. It’s a good idea, but it’s static. What we see
of her life is a photograph, not a moving picture. The story is
as dry as it could possibly be.
When the screen isn’t on Vera, it spends time with her
family. Her son chases girls, her daughter is getting engaged.
Unfortunately, there’s not much justification for the time
spent on the family. My best guess is that they bring out the
background in Vera, they magnify the very real family that she
must leave behind. If we weren’t familiar with her family,
then we would care even less that Vera was going to jail. But
it’s a weak justification. Other than provide for scaffolding,
the family is of no real interest at all. They are all static,
boring background characters. They add nothing real to the story.
In an even stranger move, the film spends time on a young lady
named Miss Wells. Miss Wells is raped, and then seeks out an abortion
otherwise she will kill herself. The film spends a good deal of
time on this character – and we watch her do nothing but
cry for a good ten minutes or so – but then she drops off
the face of the earth. Maybe she killed herself. Seriously though,
we never see her again. Again, my best guess is that she was supposed
to represent the hard case; the reason why Vera’s work was
so important. But it’s weakly done. We feel sorry for the
girl, but the fact that the girl is never a character in herself
makes her uninteresting. She’s really just wasted time in
a movie that’s doing all it can to stretch a 15 minute story
out over two hours.
I think that’s the bottom line right there. It’s
a FIFTEEN MINUTE story. This movie would have been a great short.
Everything important in this film could have been depicted in
15 minutes. Nevertheless, we are subjected to a story that drags
on and on and on. It goes on and on and never gets anywhere.
Imelda Staunton’s performance is impressive, but then again,
seriously – all she does for the latter hour is cry. It
certainly must have been difficult for her do that, knowing that
every film minute is often a good hour or so in front of the camera.
But it’s not interesting to watch. In fact, there’s
a lot of crying in this movie. In the first half, Miss Wells is
crying and then in the second it’s Vera’s turn. It’s
really rather tedious to sit through.
Strangely enough, for a film such as this, the least of my complaints
is for the sympathetic depiction of abortion. The truth is, the
film keeps remarkably away from the subject. The need of for abortion
is clearly argued for, particularly when it comes to Miss Wells.
On the other hand, the family has some genuinely negative things
to say about it when they discover what Vera has been doing –
things that the film doesn’t seem to try to defend itself
against. The son, in particular, sees abortion as horrible, and
the film seems to respect his opinion. Overall, however, the film
seems as if it really doesn’t want to get into a discussion
on whether abortion is or isn’t wrong. The only important
fact is that Vera doesn’t think it is.
I can’t go without mentioning the engagement scene, which
I’m still not sure was supposed to be funny or not. But
it’s the funniest thing I’ve seen in awhile. It’s
certainly the funniest proposal scene I’ve ever seen. Otherwise,
the film is completely devoid of interest.
|
|
|