| |
I remember a seeing a video by the Royal Shakespeare Company where
Patrick Stewart explained that it’s unwise to read Shylock
and The Merchant of Venice in terms of a post-holocaust world.
I agree. I think the play is as sympathetic to the Jewish plight
as it is negative, and I think Michael Radford’s film has
shown us that.
Shylock (Al Pacino) is a complex character, and that complexity
is played out perfectly by Pacino. Self-protective, vengeful and
seeking his own notion of justice, Shylock is not a villain –
but an all too real character, even if he’s somewhat exaggerated.
When fortunes change, and the justice seeker suddenly becomes a
mercy seeker, we sense a very real – again, perhaps too real
– a portrayal of a tortured soul.
It seems as if all the reviewers of the film have largely ignored
the text to Radford’s adaptation. Such, of course, is appropriate,
considering the already thoroughly discussed Shakespeare play. But
I wonder if the focus on the adaptation in their writing is reflective
of their focus on the adaptation of the watching. Point being here,
whatever you make of Radford’s adaptive decisions, it’s
still a pretty darn good play.
While I’m am not sufficiently familiar with the text and
its theatrical history to evaluate the technical aspects of Radford’s
decisions, I did feel that the straightforward adaptation was strong
enough to carry the text. And that whatever weaknesses the adaptation
may have had, the text is strong enough to carry the film.
The text is clever, amusing, dramatically moving, and soulfully
penetrating. Bassanio (Joseph Fiennes) seeks the mercy of Antonio
(Jeremy Irons) in order to seek the hand of Portia (Lynn Collins).
Antonio, whose wealth is abroad at the moment, seeks the mercy of
Shylock, a Jewish usurer, for the money. When Antonio’s ships
fail, he seeks the mercy of Shylock for his life.
By the end of the play, almost everyone is at the mercy of each
other for something or other, for deeds varying from harmless to
grave. While nearly everyone will say that the play has interesting
things to say “about” mercy and perhaps wax opaquely
on its themes, the most powerful thing is the very simply and clearly
stated claim that mercy – in any shape or form – is
a valuable thing, and worth practicing.
|
|
|