|
The Last Temptation of Christ is a pretty accurate depiction
of the life of Jesus Christ – that is, if Jesus were a crack
addict, or a lunatic off the street. The Jesus of The Last
Temptation bears absolutely no resemblance to the Jesus of
the Bible. Christ here is anything but divine; he hears voices
in his head and he’s not sure if they’re from God
or from Satan. He’s in love with Mary Magdalene but is too
afraid to do anything about it. In fact, he’s afraid of
everything, as he often says. He hates people but for some reason
when he speaks, the only thing that comes out of his mouth is
“love”. The message of love only lasts so long though,
as he soon discovers his true calling is to bring down an axe
on the people and trash the temple. The story is so absolutely
absurd that it’s often laughable.
I can understand a story that would want to explore the human
side of Christ. In fact, I think it could actually be rather enlightening
to depict a Christ that sometimes did have reservations about
his role on earth. But The Last Temptation of Christ
is so exaggerated, so ridiculous, it’s difficult to see
something other than an attempt at Christian-bashing. What if
a film depicted Martin Luther King as a psychopath? It wouldn’t
fly for a second.
At its start, The Last Temptation of Christ claims not
to be an account of the Gospels, but an exploration of “eternal
spiritual conflict.” The conflict involves the struggle
between the spirit and the desires of the body. Jesus struggles
with the weaknesses of the flesh and teaches the superiority of
the spirit over the body until the final titular temptation, where
he contemplates leaving the cross to go start a family with Mary
Magdalene. The film makes its point mildly, but it all takes a
backseat to the bizarre portrayal of the character of Christ.
I've heard various complaints about the Catholic slant to The
Passion of the Christ, but The
Passion’s imagery doesn’t hold a candle to
the clearly Catholic angle in The Last Temptation. Beginning
with the particularly Catholic dilemma of spirit vs. body, Temptation
also includes a Catholic baptism of Jesus and even a stigmata
in Christ’s hands prior to the crucifixion.
The Catholic slant is interesting considering there is so much
that is clearly anti-Catholic. While half of the film is of Catholic
influence, the other half is late 20th Century “intellectualism”.
This is the life of Christ as interpreted by the modern Left.
At one point, Jesus himself spits out liberal rhetoric about the
vanity and insignificance of organized religion. It’s frankly
difficult to take anything seriously in this film.
The film is, however, rather thought provoking. Tightly written,
there’s not much here that doesn’t have some significance,
symbolic or otherwise. William Defoe provides a stately but occasionally
scary portrayal of Christ, allowing us to believe this guy might
just belong in a nuthouse. David Bowie has an out-of-place stint
as Pontius Pilot.
Perhaps I ought to listen to the director’s commentary,
but, for the life of me, I can’t figure out why Scorsese
would want to tell such a story. In the end, it all just feels
like ploy for controversy in the name of art. For better or for
worse, it’s not worth the hype.
|